Hair drug testing in Other Countries

The relevance of drug screening in the workplace has various degrees of variability across the globe. Viewing importance of hair drug testing varies from 1 country to another. Hair drug testing is much more applicable for developed countries that have more stringent laws in relation to the quality of work environment. Among developing nations, the value of drug assessments is waning.

The rational for hair drug testing at work is ambiguous even in developed countries like the Usa. In terms of monetary reduction, the U.Utes. economy is dropping more than US$ 250 million each year written off as drug abuse cost, including about 500 million lost working days. The lost working days created by drug-abused employees are 66 percent greater than the absences incurred by healthy employees.

As the United States has made similar studies on the impact of drug abuse within the work place, other nations like the United Kingdom and Canada have also moved up their efforts to understand the drug problem. In the UK, between 11 million and 17 million working days tend to be lost each year, priced at the UK economy as much as 1.8 million pounds per year. Drug abuse is highly related to function efficiency in Canada where the economy is losing $400 million in lost productivity. Thus the actual primacy of hair drug testing in the workplace is much more critical in countries looking to cut its economic costs.

Locks drug testing is comparatively new in the United States. Nevertheless, other countries have yet to catch up with this trend especially in applying these drug tests to regulate the workplace.

However, the phenomenon is catching up. UK courts possess acknowledged hair medication testing as a cause for irrefutable evidence. Countries such as Belgium and Finland believe that privacy is definitely an indivisible right above the actual mechanisms of drug testing in the workplace.

Nations in Europe also have experienced increase in interest in drug tests. Nevertheless, hair drug screening is casted in a negative light. Studies have shown that dark haired individuals are more prone to test positive compared to light-haired individuals. Therefore, the requirement to validate such test results by using additional methods other than locks drug testing is important especially in Europe high are ethical issues that is being pushed in the forefront.

The advantage of hair drug testing is actually longer detection prices as compared to urine drug tests. However, the belief that there is a probability of false positive in locks drug testing can be a cause of concern in nations who worth the rights of employees. While drug testing is slowly catching up there are still structural hindrances and cultural values that governs a country's ethical standards upon such issues.

Article resource: articlemotron . com